2 job vacancies at RMT - 1) Bar Person, Doncaster 2) Solicitor (5 years PQE)

 

2 job vacancies at Unite the Union - Organisers and Organisers in Training

 

1 job vacancy at the Morning Star - Subeditor

 

The Morning Star Shop - Online now

 

Donate to the Morning Star Fighting Fund

Subscribe to the Morning Star Mailing List

Progressive Web Listings

Read about EDM 1334

 

 

The Morning Star on Twitter Friends of the Morning Star on Facebook

 

Ken Gill Memorial Fund

 

Revolting Europe - London-based writer, journalist and regular Morning Star contributor Tom Gill focuses on developments in the European left, trade union and social movements

 



Britain

Duggan family hit out at gun supply trial

Thursday 18 October 2012

The family of police shooting victim Mark Duggan criticised the trial of the man alleged to have supplied Mr Duggan with a gun today for being more about the deceased than the accused.

A jury at Snaresbrook Crown Court failed to reach a verdict on Wednesday in the case of Kevin Hutchinson-Foster, 30, who is accused of supplying a gun to Mr Duggan just 15 minutes before he was shot dead by police marksmen on August 4 2011.

A retrial is now expected.

During the trial the prosecution alleged that Mr Duggan had collected the BBM Bruni Model 92 handgun minutes before he was shot dead.

Armed police, who gave evidence anonymously, told the court that they opened fire on Mr Duggan because they saw him get out of the cab holding a loaded gun.

Prosecutors said Mr Duggan, who was under police surveillance on August 4 and the previous day, had gone in the minicab to Leyton, east London, where he collected the gun in a shoebox from Mr Hutchinson-Foster, before continuing to Tottenham.

Mr Duggan's family said they were very concerned about the "unjustified and untested" prosecution's claim that he was holding a gun when he was shot.

The family was not represented at the trial which they argued meant police officers' evidence has not been challenged or tested.

They are also concerned that a retrial could lead to further delays to the inquest into Mr Duggan's death.

The family said that the inquest should consider two main questions - whether Mark Duggan was armed at the point at which he was shot and whether the use of lethal force was necessary.

Mr Duggan's brother Shaun Hall said: "It feels like this has been the Mark Duggan trial, except his family has had no representation and without being able to defend himself.

"People have been allowed to say things in court about Mark and what happened that day without being challenged. We heard things that we had never heard before."

Inquest co-director Deborah Coles said: "Nothing can satisfy family, community and public confidence other than a prompt, open and transparent jury inquest with the full involvement of Mark Duggan's family. Open justice is of fundamental importance in the case of a man shot dead by police officers."

If you appreciated this article then please consider donating to the Morning Star's Fighting Fund to ensure we can keep developing your paper.

Donate to the Fighting Fund here

Editorial

Exploit Tory woes, Labour

Lord Feldman says that he didn't call grassroots Tories "mad swivel-eyed loons" while his accusers stand by their stories that he did.

Features

Let's get Britain back on track

by Mick Whelan

As Aslef's annual assembly of delegates begins in Edinburgh tomorrow the general secretary explains the challenges his members - and workers across the country - face

The vicious cycle of eurozone decline

by Tom Gill

France is the latest to face clamour from the EU to enforce crippling 'structural reforms.' The medicine is killing the patient