The fight must go on for Remploy

Years ago I worked in the Remploy factory in Brixton. Tucked away off the main road a short distance from Brixton town centre it stood in its own yard, a 1960s-built one-storey factory abutting a two-floor office building.

Much like any other light industrial unit in any of thousands of yards up and down the country.

Indeed, the similarity didn't end there. Once you pushed open the factory doors you entered a veritable hive of industry.

Casting an eye around the open-plan factory you'd have seen several production lines employing 30 or 40 people, while others sat or stood at individual workstations carrying out tasks such as soldering, complex wiring operations and testing delicate computer boards and cards.

Bells would sound, signalling break times to small groups of workers.

Off they'd traipse to a canteen at the far end of the shop floor, chatting to one another, some engaging in horseplay, laughing and calling out to mates across the factory divide.

This toing and froing, hustle and bustle soundtracked by the thrumming of tools, laughter and banter was the very theatre and music of industry.

However, this was a Remploy factory, and while replicating the average light-industrial workplace found in any city, town or edge-of-town industrial estate anywhere in Britain, there was one difference - all the shop-floor staff and many of the white coats were disabled.

In 1945 Britain had experienced six long and hard years in a state of war.

Now she was ready for a welfare state, and so Remploy was born.

A company that employed disabled people, giving them meaningful employment in a safe, union-organised working environment.

From its first factory in 1945 at Bridgend making violins, Remploy would over the years spread across Britain growing to employ over 10,000 factory workers in 84 sites.

So, what went wrong?

Thatcher and neoliberalism is part of the problem. But a lack of understanding of Remploy and disabled workers' choice, especially by the left and in particular by the purists within the disability movement, also contributed to the demise of Remploy factories.

Even six years ago when Europe eased public contract procurement regulations for supported employers, Remploy's board of directors sat on its hands. Instead of fighting for these contracts the directors made no effort, never bringing in more than around 20 per cent of public contract work.

Then the axe came to drop and four years ago, to its everlasting shame, a Labour government began the mass closure of Remploy factories - 30 closed in March 2008.

A survey carried out earlier this year among the 2,500 Remploy workers who took redundancy in 2008 found 85 per cent of them no longer in full-time employment.

The class of 2012 can expect to fare far worse.

As an ex-Remploy worker and union branch secretary (from 1996 to 2012) I have been involved with my branch and membership in struggles to keep factories open since 1999.

In that time my comrades from within and without Remploy have tirelessly fought and supported the concept of disabled workers' choice.

In the last campaign, beginning in 2007 and ending in 2008, the trade unions threw all their political and organisational weight behind us.

Unite - still in its component Amicus and T&G state - the GMB and Community produced an alternative business plan and we embarked on a Remploy crusade, touring the country Remploy factory site by factory site.

I criss-crossed Britain with other Unite branch activists attending rallies and demos in England, Scotland and Wales. But despite our efforts the factories closed.

Four years on the war recommenced. This time the government went right to the heart of the established disability movement and handed a purse of silver to Liz Sayce, then the CEO of Radar (an organisation that had helped stab us in the back in 2007) to supply it with a report on disability employment support.

Sayce played up to the gallery, just as her paymasters expected.

She condemned both Remploy and residential training courses as too costly while recommending Access to Work to the government.

What you won't find within the pages of Sayce's partial findings are the true feelings of thousands of Remploy workers whom she chose to ignore.

Instead she cited the views of the minority whose agenda chimed with her own.

Needless to say, Sayce's reputation within the disability movement, as well as that of her new organisation Disability Rights UK which is still vociferously backing the government's closure programme, is much damaged.

Fast forward to today.

Despite a number of strikes across almost all Remploy factories, despite thousands of letters written to MPs, ministers, councillors and politicians of every stripe and stature by workers, their families, friends and supporters, despite billboards attacking this disgraceful action, despite a 100,000-signature petition handed into the PM, despite the double-dip recession with its attendant hardships of cuts and mass unemployment (most yet to happen) - despite all these actions, this stony-hearted government, following its ideology, refuses to budge from destroying the jobs, hopes and aspirations of 1,518 disabled Remploy workers.

The fight goes on - as it must. Unite remains steadfastly behind your cause.

If your factories close in the next few weeks it will not be from the want of effort from you and the trade unions, Unite, GMB and Community.