Private health firms' intimate links with peers helping to ram through the government's NHS break-up plans were laid bare today by the Unite union.
Voting records exposed by the union reveal that a host of so-called "backswoodsman" peers - those usually absent from the House of Lords - have been instrumental in pushing through the pro-privatisation Health and Social Care Bill.
Its second reading in early October saw the biggest turnout by members of the notoriously part-time chamber since the 1993 Maastricht Treaty debate.
And many of those who turned up to back the Bill work for companies that stand to gain from its passing or work as lobbyists.
Unite's list of shame included tax-avoiding billionaire and health firm investor Lord Ashcroft, health privateer Bupa director Baroness Bottomley, lobbyists Baroness Cumberlege, Saatchi & Saatchi founder Lord Bell and Lord Chadlington and NHS IT supplier AMT-Sybex Group director Lord Coe.
Unite national officer for health Rachael Maskell accused the peers today of hijacking democracy "for the financial benefit of the private healthcare companies, many of whom have made large contributions to the Tory Party since Prime Minister David Cameron became its leader in 2005.
"It is an indelible stain on parliamentary democracy that, while the vast majority of the electorate don't want their NHS privatised, a cabal of unelected peers, riddled with vested financial self-interest, can be mobilised to thwart the wishes of voters."
The Bill reached the committee stage in the Lords today.
If you have enjoyed this article then please consider donating to the Morning Star's Fighting Fund to ensure we can keep publishing your paper.
If Liam Fox, the disgraced former minister forced to resign just four months ago for his inability to distinguish between government responsibilities and personal interests, had any sense of shame, he would maintain a dignified silence.
Bill Williams on why taxpayers should be angry at the sordid saga of QinetiQ
Focusing on the 'nation' while ignoring class is to misunderstand Scotland's needs, says Vince Mills

