MEDIA coverage of local election results shows anti-Corbyn obsession has reached epic proportions.
Tired but elated I returned home from the Redbridge local election count on Friday morning. Wanstead Village had returned three Labour councillors, of which I was one, for the first time.
The two incumbent Labour councillors in neighbouring Wanstead Park were returned, thereby turning Wanstead, the former constituency of Winston Churchill, red for the first time.
It had been a thrilling night at the Redbridge count, with Labour making 15 gains, reducing the Tories to just 12 members of a 63-member council — a trouncing indeed.
Imagine then my amazement to return home and turn on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme to hear the night being portrayed as a disaster for Labour.
The first voice I heard was the anti-Corbyn Labour MP Chuka Umunna calling for an NEC inquiry into the “disaster” that was the local elections.
The media narrative rumbled on in similar vein. Failure to win overall control of the London boroughs of Barnet and Wandsworth was taken as defining the whole Labour campaign.
Headlines on the days that followed the election results, declared that “peak Corbyn” had been passed, going on to predict that it would all be downhill from here.
The front page of the Times carried the negative narrative with few named sources — one insider said this, someone else said that.
The Corbyn naysayers were once again out in force, being given free rein across the airwaves and newspaper columns to attack the Labour leadership.
It took Labour MP and shadow international development secretary Barry Gardiner to introduce some semblance of reality, pointing out on Peston on Sunday that Labour had won 2,350 seats, up 77, the Tories had won 1,332 seats, down 33, the Liberal Democrats won 536 seats, up 75, while Ukip held just three seats — down 123 seats.
An objective observer might have thought that Labour gains, a Liberal Democrat revival and the wipeout of Ukip was the story, not a manufactured narrative that it was all a disaster for Corbyn’s Labour — an account no doubt concocted long before a vote was cast.
What is evident from the coverage of Corbyn and Labour is that there is a whole new brand of fake news under way.
The amount of exposure given to Corbyn critics is extraordinary.
There are now a group of what could be called anti-Corbyn correspondents, such as Dan Hodges, who has virtually cornered the market since his fall from Labour Party eminence.
Another is Mathew D’Ancona, who treats Guardian and Evening Standard readers to regular anti-Corbyn diatribes, while Tony Blair’s old spin doctor Alastair Campbell is never slow to stick the knife in.
The assault on Corbyn really is unprecedented. Labour leaders from whatever part of the party always have a hard time from the media, but the assault on Corbyn is surreal at times.
There have been the accusations that he was a Czech spy, heavy criticism of his grown-up stance in calling for evidence of Russian involvement in the Salisbury events and the effort to personalise the anti-semitism accusations on Corbyn rather than setting it in the context of a party problem.
The media treads a thin line between truth and lies. The mainstream often veers toward the official side of things, siding with the Establishment to such a degree in many cases that they become virtual propagandists.
Truth-telling and holding elected people and institutions to account is often in short supply, though it is what the public expects from the media.
Too much propaganda leads to discrediting in the long run, which translates in the end to people not buying those news products.
It is usually at this point that owners wake up to what is going on. When the bottom line is hit, things have to change.
It seems no coincidence that newspapers and other media sources have plummeted in popularity over recent years, as they have increasingly moved towards creating the self-serving narratives of a small elite. There is a growing disconnect with more and more people.
Personalised attacks on Corbyn and the Labour leadership need to stop. Politics is about how the country is run — it really is too important to be reduced to the genre of an episode of X factor.
Let’s get rid of the witch-hunts, the ludicrous allegations and personal denigration and get back to things that really effect the lives of British citizens.
For more of Paul Donovan’s writing visit paulfdonovan.blogspot.com.
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by joining the 501 club.
Just £5 a month gives you the opportunity to win one of 17 prizes, from £25 to the £501 jackpot.
By becoming a 501 Club member you are helping the Morning Star cover its printing, distribution and staff costs — help keep our paper thriving by joining!
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by become a member of the People’s Printing Press Society.
The Morning Star is a readers’ co-operative, which means you can become an owner of the paper too by buying shares in the society.
Shares are £1 each — though unlike capitalist firms, each shareholder has an equal say. Money from shares contributes directly to keep our paper thriving.
Some union branches have taken out shares of over £500 and individuals over £100.
You can’t buy a revolution, but you can help the only daily paper in Britain that’s fighting for one by donating to the Fighting Fund.
The Morning Star is unique, as a lone socialist voice in a sea of corporate media. We offer a platform for those who would otherwise never be listened to, coverage of stories that would otherwise be buried.
The rich don’t like us, and they don’t advertise with us, so we rely on you, our readers and friends. With a regular donation to our monthly Fighting Fund, we can continue to thumb our noses at the fat cats and tell truth to power.
Donate today and make a regular contribution.